.
Feedback

School District Settles Wrongful Termination Lawsuit for $69K

A lawsuit involving a former school psychologist who claimed that the San Rafael City School wrongfully fired her for requesting time off to care for her newborn was settled for $68,950.

San Rafael City Schools recently settled a wrongful termination lawsuit alleging that the district discriminated against a former employee when she requested time off to care for her newborn baby.

The district paid Krista Alexander $68,950 and charges of discrimination were dismissed, according to attorney Dan Siegel, who assisted in the lawsuit.

Alexander, who worked as the bilingual school psychologist, claimed that she was fired in June 2010 due to requests for time off to spend with her child, according to court records.

Director of special education and Alexander's supervisor Amy Baer was named in the lawsuit along with the district for refusing the psychologist's requests to work from home, as she had the previous school year, and to take one day off a week to care for her son, according to court records.

Alexander worked the 2009-10 school year, but was told that she would not be returning because of her work performance. Complaints regarding Alexander's work came from Harriet MacLean, principal at Davidson Middle School and Liz Block, principal at Laurel Dell Elementary School.

At the time she said she was entitled to nine weeks of leave under the California Family Rights Act, which allows up to 12 weeks of leave for most new parents.

The district's lawyers pushed to get the case dismissed, stating that Alexander's claims ranged "from disingenuous to puzzling.

"Nothing could make it clearer that Alexander cannot maintain her claims than her responses to the defendant's state of undisputed material facts," attorneys from Stubb & Leone stated in court documents.

According to the court records, Block informed Baer that Alexander was not attending meetings, was unwilling to perform assessment tests on students and described her behavior and work as unprofessional, unprepared or incomplete and argumentative.

"In short, all the facts regarding the negative feedback Baer got about her performance are established as true," the district's attorneys state in the court records.

"Like" us on Facebook | Follow us Twitter | Get "Patched" in with our newsletter | Start a blog

See what else is happening on San Rafael Patch:

  1. Officials Try to Calm Terra Linda Neighbors' Concerns Over Community School Relocation
  2. No One Injured in Cell Phone Store Shooting
  3. San Rafael’s Cheapest Homes: 77 Village Circle
  4. Hunters Rescued When Small Boat Nearly Capsizes
  5. Mill Valley Man Recounts New Year's Eve Rescue on Mount Tam

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Rafael Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kevin Moore May 11, 2013 at 04:20 pm
It would be nice if the comments section had "Thumbs up / Thumbs down" like the PressRead More Democrat.
Bob April 6, 2013 at 05:20 pm
Check with the San Rafael planning commission and get the low-down on why they turned down aRead More developer who submitted his plans to demolish and rebuild a mixed commercial/residential building at 2nd and B. That's directly across the street from SVDP, and a notorious loitering spot. It's currently a run-down box building that's long past its prime. The developer came in with a beautiful plan, and it was denied for, among other things, because it was not in keeping with the "Victorian era" of the others, and because the city was afraid people would store their bikes on the balconies. Take a look at it. It's the most run-down corner in the downtown area. A great way for a small town to thrive and achieve an identity, is to get people living there. The city makes it extremely difficult with their rigid design board, and archaic operations that remind me of private industry in the 70s. Oh, and then they approved Target - completely disregarding the data from our neighbors up north, as well as other small towns.
Scott Adams April 4, 2013 at 07:08 pm
Tim, I am aware of many who want to increase the housing density downtown. I am also aware thereRead More has been objections particularly around the bus and future SMART station. It seems having commercial use at street level and housing above is favored by the city. It would definitely help bring people downtown. Other elements besides safety, includes maintenance, on going activities and marketing. I made reference to Healdsburg which is a good case study. They endorsed a study by urban planners around 1990. It took until 2000 when Hotel Healdsburg opened and then the downtown took off. They have one big asset and that is their city park which is where they have ongoing activities. Public Spaces such as this offer a sense of place and acts as a magnet. If you go two or three block away from the park, Healdsburg is just another sleepy little town of 11,000. Sure the wine country is a tourist attraction, but according to the County Visitor's Bureau Marin has 12 million visitors a year who enjoy our natural environment and 80% leave and go elsewhere in the evening.
Tim H April 4, 2013 at 04:41 pm
Thank you all for your interest in this topic. Scott, are you aware of any new multifamily or mixedRead More use housing in downtown on the horizon? Someone in another article mentioned the need for greater density in the downtown area. It seems like greater density could make San Rafael a more attractive place to bring business. Maybe it's me being optimistic, but certain areas seem ripe for development which could be a catalyst for improving downtown. Just curious if others had any perspective of this issue.