.
Feedback

Two Sober Living Facilities Cause Stir with Neighbors

Neighbors from Forbes and Gerstle Park worry that two sober living facilities will cause parking problems and traffic congestion.

Residents from Forbes and Gerstle Park urged city council members to investigate two new sober living communities in the area, claiming that the new facilities will bring in a transient population that will have negative impacts on the neighborhood.

“What’s happening here could happen in any neighborhood,” said Steve Patterson, chair of the Federation of San Rafael Neighborhoods. “And it would be a total disaster for Culloden Park.”


In the beginning of February, a sober living facility that houses recovering alcoholics and drug addicts . For-profit business Bay Area Sober Living owns the facility and will not accept insurance or provide therapy for those who live in the house.

Since the facility won’t offer treatment, government regulations restricting the number of occupants do not apply, Bay Area Sober Living Manager Leo van Warmerdam told neighbors before the house opened. He plans to charge residents $4000 a month for a room and meals, and expects between 12 and 15 people to live at the house at one time.

Neighbors are concerned that the facility will cause problems with parking and traffic congestions in the area, which is zoned as residential.

“We are not opposed to a sober living facility,” neighbor Jane Sykes said. “This constitutes a boarding house.”

A similar facility exists on 201 Marin St. in Gerstle Park. Andrea Eneidi lives next door to the facility, which houses six to eight men at one time. The 201 Marin St. property was on the market for months and didn’t sell, she said. Eventually, it took down its “For Sale” sign and opened as a sober living house.

The City recently obtained a description of the Culloden property from van Warmerdam, and staff will be meeting on Feb. 24 to evaluate if the house complies with regulations, according to an email sent out by Planning Manager Paul Jensen. City officials will also inspect the Culloden property to see if it is up to code.

“This is a start, not an end,” Mayor Albert J. Boro assured the neighbors.

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Rafael Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kevin Moore May 11, 2013 at 04:20 pm
It would be nice if the comments section had "Thumbs up / Thumbs down" like the PressRead More Democrat.
Bob April 6, 2013 at 05:20 pm
Check with the San Rafael planning commission and get the low-down on why they turned down aRead More developer who submitted his plans to demolish and rebuild a mixed commercial/residential building at 2nd and B. That's directly across the street from SVDP, and a notorious loitering spot. It's currently a run-down box building that's long past its prime. The developer came in with a beautiful plan, and it was denied for, among other things, because it was not in keeping with the "Victorian era" of the others, and because the city was afraid people would store their bikes on the balconies. Take a look at it. It's the most run-down corner in the downtown area. A great way for a small town to thrive and achieve an identity, is to get people living there. The city makes it extremely difficult with their rigid design board, and archaic operations that remind me of private industry in the 70s. Oh, and then they approved Target - completely disregarding the data from our neighbors up north, as well as other small towns.
Scott Adams April 4, 2013 at 07:08 pm
Tim, I am aware of many who want to increase the housing density downtown. I am also aware thereRead More has been objections particularly around the bus and future SMART station. It seems having commercial use at street level and housing above is favored by the city. It would definitely help bring people downtown. Other elements besides safety, includes maintenance, on going activities and marketing. I made reference to Healdsburg which is a good case study. They endorsed a study by urban planners around 1990. It took until 2000 when Hotel Healdsburg opened and then the downtown took off. They have one big asset and that is their city park which is where they have ongoing activities. Public Spaces such as this offer a sense of place and acts as a magnet. If you go two or three block away from the park, Healdsburg is just another sleepy little town of 11,000. Sure the wine country is a tourist attraction, but according to the County Visitor's Bureau Marin has 12 million visitors a year who enjoy our natural environment and 80% leave and go elsewhere in the evening.
Tim H April 4, 2013 at 04:41 pm
Thank you all for your interest in this topic. Scott, are you aware of any new multifamily or mixedRead More use housing in downtown on the horizon? Someone in another article mentioned the need for greater density in the downtown area. It seems like greater density could make San Rafael a more attractive place to bring business. Maybe it's me being optimistic, but certain areas seem ripe for development which could be a catalyst for improving downtown. Just curious if others had any perspective of this issue.