.
Feedback

SMART Board Pushes Attachment onto Repeal Petitions

Despite the California Secretary of State's position that it does not have the legal authority to do so, board back ordinance that allows SMART to prepare a neutral analysis of the RepealSMART initiative and place it on their petitions

Petitions to repeal the quarter-cent sales tax to help pay for the SMART train and pathway between Santa Rosa and San Rafael will contain a summary analysis of the proposed ballot initiative drafted by SMART itself.

The Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District's Board of Directors Wednesday afternoon unanimously approved an ordinance that allows SMART to prepare a neutral analysis of the repeal initiative.

Starting Oct. 26, the analysis will be attached to the petitions being circulated by RepealSMART. Signatures in petitions already collected since last month still will be counted.

It's still uncertain how many signatures will be required to put the tax repeal measure on the ballot next year.

The grassroots organization says the tax should be repealed because voters approved the quarter-cent sales tax in 2008 for a 70-mile rail and bike and pathway between Cloverdale and Larkspur, not the current 37-mile, $360 million rail and pathway segment between Santa Rosa and San Rafael.

SMART downsized the project because of the adverse economy and reduced sales tax revenue since 2008. The "initial operating segment" between Santa Rosa and San Rafael could be in operation in 2014 or 2015, according to SMART. SMART hopes the rest of the rail line and pathway will be completed when funds are available, possibly by 2017-2018.

Several members of RepealSMART this afternoon questioned whether SMART could draft an impartial analysis of the project. Others advised the SMART board of directors to draft its own ballot initiative on whether SMART should proceed with the project and submit it to voters in the spring or fall of 2012 rather than inject itself into the

RepealSMART repeal initiative effort.

Lowell Finley, Chief Counsel for the California Secretary of State, informed the SMART board on Monday it does not have the legal authority to adopt the ordinance.

The SMART board, however, proceeded with the vote on the advice of its two attorneys.

The difference of opinion stems from which section of the state Elections Code applies to the initiative process for districts such as SMART.

Clay Mitchell, spokesman for RepealSMART, said he doesn't know if the group will challenge the vote to approve the ordinance. The deadline to collect signatures on the petitions is Jan. 28.

--Bay City News Service

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Rafael Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kevin Moore May 11, 2013 at 04:20 pm
It would be nice if the comments section had "Thumbs up / Thumbs down" like the PressRead More Democrat.
John Wyek February 26, 2013 at 04:10 pm
We have been to Pet Emergency a few times with various animals over the years, and they areRead More absolutely FANTASTIC! Top quality medical care, and a very caring and compassionate staff. I can't say that I look forward to going there (sick pets are always difficult), but I am sure glad they are here for us when we need them!
Kelley Thieme February 26, 2013 at 03:14 pm
Nice too see the fee they charge for being in the room when they put your family pet down is goingRead More to good use :(