.
Feedback

Could Residential Permits Solve Neighborhood Parking Problems?

The City Council held a study session to discuss the feasibility of a residential parking permit program.

{Does your neighborhood need a residential parking permit? Vote in the poll below.}

City staff want to know if neighbors think residential permits will solve problems with limited parking in areas like Gerstle Park and Montecito.

In a study session on Monday, city staff discussed the feasibility of a permit program to help residents find parking in their own neighborhoods, instead of having to hunt for a space. Council members decided they wanted more feedback from communities that suffer the most from limited parking, like Gerstle Park and Montecito.


Gerstle Park, located near , and Montecito, located near the , both experience commercial and commuter spillover that can limit the amount of available parking spaces for residents.

With the SMART train coming to downtown and future growth, the area’s parking situation could get worse, according to Michael Iswalt, a senior engineer at San Francisco-based consulting firm Arup.

A permit program would entail all-day parking for permitted vehicles with short-term parking allowed for those who don’t live in the area. Parking districts would be created through surveys and studies, and a set number of permits would be set to each household. The majority of the households would have to opt-in to the program and guest permits would also be sold.

Start-up costs include paying for and installing permit signs in neighborhoods (approximately $350 per sign), while paying for maintenance and the personnel to enforce and issue permits would be ongoing. Residents would pay $40 a year for parking permit, while parking citations are approximately $35, according to Iswalt.

In order for the program to become self sustaining in five years, neighborhoods would have to have a high rate of participation and permits would eventually have to increase to $95 per year with a one-time start-up fee of $150 and parking citations would have to be around $55, Iswalt said.

Palo Alto launched a similar permit program in a neighborhood with 900 residents clustered in a 0.3-square-mile area. Stanford University funded the start-up costs, but first year revenues were lower than the city estimated. So the permit went from $15 to $40 per year.  In Marin County, Mill Valley and Sausalito both have parking permit programs.

“It’s hard to know how these programs are doing now, since no one has really gone back to analyze the programs once they start,” Iswalt said.

Parking enforcement is currently focused on downtown San Rafael, and the Council debated whether a permit program would solve the problem for limited parking in the surrounding neighborhoods or just move the problem to another area.

“Getting a parking permit doesn’t guarantee you a parking space. It gives you a hunting license to find one,” City Manager Nancy Mackle said.

Residents questioned if permit fees would increase if the amount of citations, a revenue source for the city, went down due to the program.

“It sounds like it’s a lot of problems for the solution,” San Rafael resident Don Magdanz said.

San Rafael Police Chief Diana Bishop also brought up the personnel who would be needed to enforce violations. “At what point are we losing enforcement in other areas?” she said.

Others found contention with the two to four hour limit for non-residents parking in neighborhoods. Jackie Schmidt lives on Grand Avenue where parking overflow comes from the nearby shopping center. Many employees are encouraged to park in her neighborhood so they can leave spaces open to potential customers.

According to Schmidt, many Montecito neighbors work from their homes and parking problems will only get worse with the coming downtown SMART train station that will be built blocks away.

“A two hour limit is not the solution,” she said.

Mayor Gary Phillips requested that Iswalt and city staff contact several San Rafael residents to evaluate if they would support an opt-in permit program before the Council considers conducting a study.

“A successful program has to solve a problem, not just be cost neutral,” Councilman Andrew McCullough said.

Do you think your neighborhood needs a parking permit program? Tell us in the comments.

"Like" us on Facebook | Follow us Twitter | Get "Patched" in with our newsletter | Start a blog

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Rafael Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kevin Moore May 11, 2013 at 04:20 pm
It would be nice if the comments section had "Thumbs up / Thumbs down" like the PressRead More Democrat.
Bob April 6, 2013 at 05:20 pm
Check with the San Rafael planning commission and get the low-down on why they turned down aRead More developer who submitted his plans to demolish and rebuild a mixed commercial/residential building at 2nd and B. That's directly across the street from SVDP, and a notorious loitering spot. It's currently a run-down box building that's long past its prime. The developer came in with a beautiful plan, and it was denied for, among other things, because it was not in keeping with the "Victorian era" of the others, and because the city was afraid people would store their bikes on the balconies. Take a look at it. It's the most run-down corner in the downtown area. A great way for a small town to thrive and achieve an identity, is to get people living there. The city makes it extremely difficult with their rigid design board, and archaic operations that remind me of private industry in the 70s. Oh, and then they approved Target - completely disregarding the data from our neighbors up north, as well as other small towns.
Scott Adams April 4, 2013 at 07:08 pm
Tim, I am aware of many who want to increase the housing density downtown. I am also aware thereRead More has been objections particularly around the bus and future SMART station. It seems having commercial use at street level and housing above is favored by the city. It would definitely help bring people downtown. Other elements besides safety, includes maintenance, on going activities and marketing. I made reference to Healdsburg which is a good case study. They endorsed a study by urban planners around 1990. It took until 2000 when Hotel Healdsburg opened and then the downtown took off. They have one big asset and that is their city park which is where they have ongoing activities. Public Spaces such as this offer a sense of place and acts as a magnet. If you go two or three block away from the park, Healdsburg is just another sleepy little town of 11,000. Sure the wine country is a tourist attraction, but according to the County Visitor's Bureau Marin has 12 million visitors a year who enjoy our natural environment and 80% leave and go elsewhere in the evening.
Tim H April 4, 2013 at 04:41 pm
Thank you all for your interest in this topic. Scott, are you aware of any new multifamily or mixedRead More use housing in downtown on the horizon? Someone in another article mentioned the need for greater density in the downtown area. It seems like greater density could make San Rafael a more attractive place to bring business. Maybe it's me being optimistic, but certain areas seem ripe for development which could be a catalyst for improving downtown. Just curious if others had any perspective of this issue.