.
Feedback

Neighbors Perturbed over Grady Ranch's Environmental Impacts

George Lucas' planned digital studio drew oppostion at Marin County's Planning Commission meeting Monday.

Questions surrounding the environmental impact of film tycoon George Lucas' proposed digital production studio in Lucas Valley arose during a Marin County Planning Commission hearing Monday morning.

By the end of the meeting, the commission was still in the dark about several issues involving traffic, the restoration of surrounding creeks and more.


"It was a meeting where no decision was going to be made. It was meant to hear the public's opinion," Planning Commission Chair Peter Theran said in a phone interview.

The only decision made was that they would not extend the deadline for public comment on the environmental impact, which ends Tuesday, Dec. 13 at 4p.m.

If you wish to comment on the plan, email Commission Secretary Debra Stratton at dstratton@co.marin.ca.us.

Grady Ranch

The proposed Grady Ranch will consist of an approximately 270,000 square foot digital production studio, which includes administration offices, an employee restaurant, a general store, a wine tasting room, screening rooms, costume storage, dressing rooms, 20 overnight employee guest suites, a basement parking garage and film stages, according to the staff report

The project, which was approved along with its environmental impact report in 1996, is in its second phase. Since then, county staff identified several new issues not addressed in the 1996 report, including the volume of greenhouse gas emissions and the threat to species living in the surrounding habitat.

Changes Since 1996

In that time, steelhead trout became a threatened species, and the studio's construction could disturb the steelhead population in the nearby creeks. The impact of greenhouse gases on climate change was not addressed in 1996 report either, and the original plan's greenhouse gas emissions from operations would exceed the threshold set by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, according to the staff report.

Lucas, a San Anselmo resident, decided to scale back the project from the original proposal, which mitigated many of the environmental impacts. New measures, such as restoring Miller Creek and paying fees for greenhouse gas reductions, were also added to mitigate the environmental impacts.

There are less impacts than before and more perks, Interim Environmental Coordinator Rachel Warner said.

Find more of the changes and their mitigations in the staff report on the right.

Public Comment

Several Lucas Valley neighbors and Marin County residents are concerned about the scale of the development and lack of details in the supplemental report. 

"There are six to eight inches of material (from 1996) with a half inch of icing of supplemental material," said Carolyn Lenert, representing the North San Rafael Coalition of Residents.

Lenert was one of many who told the Planning Commission there was a need for more community input and awareness about Grady Ranch. Many neighbors said they were unaware of the plan for constructing the studio until recently. 

"It's a 15-year-old plan that has been rushed to judgement," Lenert said.

Although the Lucas Valley Homeowners Association has not taken a position, its vice president, Dale Miller, approves of the plan because of the restoration of Miller Creek.

"I believe that the creek restoration measures will help them moderate the creek during heavy rainfall and decrease downstream erosion," he said.

Other neighbors mentioned issues with the building's height, with the potential noise from events at Grady Ranch and traffic.  

Merits of the Project

Monday's meeting was meant to solicit public input and address the adequacy of the new findings added to the 1996 environmental report. The commission will meet again on Feb. 27 to discuss the "merits of the project," according to Theran.

Tom Forster, acting as a representative for Skywalker Properties Ltd., hopes his organization's history in Marin will ease the public's concerns until February.

"We've been at Skyalker Ranch for more than 30 years," he said. "Look at the actions, not the speculation."



Susan M Khaury December 13, 2011 at 08:17 pm
This plan would bring much needed jobs to the area, including highly coveted careers in the creative arts. In this economy, every community must think in terms of providing jobs to the many who have lost their source of income or are underemployed.
Tucker Murphy December 13, 2011 at 09:20 pm
I'm sure the Claus Circle residents are against it.
Gary Erwin May 23, 2012 at 01:21 pm
Dixon California is ready to throw down the "Welcome Home" mat for Lucasfilm. We are ready, able and more than willing to host the studio. Let's get out the gold shovels and start the digging!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Rafael Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Withdraw the Civic Center Priority Development Area
Ciel Niesen-Love June 15, 2013 at 07:41 pm
I, for one, am glad they're finally doing this. I have watched for years as Marin has ignored theRead More population growth that has affected us all. Not wanting to put in a commuter train, until the traffic lining the freeway is backed up into another county in the morning, is just one example of this. Then we have the fact that most of the children that my husband and I went to school with in Terra Linda have had to move to other counties because we can't find affordable housing in this one. To top it all off, it seems that the ones who have blocked us from making the smaller additions throughout the county have been people directly involved in the real estate industry, or just local home owners so worried about the value of their homes going down, that they fail to see the larger picture. So here we are, about to make a stride in alleviating the problem, and instead of rallying to make our communities better, we're trying to make it more difficult for the people who live and grew up here to still remain close to their families, not to mention the disabled adults and large elderly population in this county that are in need of this, as well. Some of the teacher's who work in this district have to commute in that traffic every morning, because they can't afford to live in this county, either. It's a sad commentary on where our priorities are when we can't support each other as a community.
John Parulis June 17, 2013 at 11:44 am
Ciel......we're talking big box freeway developments that will add tremendous traffic, schooling andRead More tax burdens to our community. Your ideas about population growth in Marin are off.
Ciel Niesen-Love June 17, 2013 at 02:49 pm
I know the population in Marin is 1% per year, but why do you think that is? People are livingRead More longer and our children are the healthiest in the country. I'll tell you why. It's because the children grow up and move out of the county, because it's not affordable. Here is an example of my latest thoughts on the matter: As the member of a Native American tribe, I have to say that I really resent being told where I should be able to live by an immigrant such as Richard Hall. I believe that roots are important and even if the growth rate has been 1%, it's only because most of the people who have grown up here can not afford to live here and move away. The elderly who make up a large percent of the population here are living longer due to medical advances and who do you suppose will take care of them? People such as myself and for not nearly enough money to live here. So what do you propose? You think that I should move to the East Bay or the North Bay and commute? Well, due to the lack of transportation support, that sound so lovely, let me tell you. Also, the children in Marin are the healthiest in the country according to a recent article I've read. Lower children death rates and such, so who is supposed to teach them and provide care for them and for not enough money to live here? Well, many teachers and care providers that I know that have to commute or live multiple roommates. You have successfully produced a community that only grows 1% per year. Congratulations. Through your grassroots efforts of blocking housing and transportation for years and claiming they don't live up to your standards, meanwhile not providing any pushes for what you might actually feel is smarter you have shut out your county's own children and hard working patriots. So, we can work for minimum wage taking care of your elderly, your children, your precious houses and cars, but God forbid, our children go to school with yours, or that you might actually have to bump into us at the supermarket and say "hi". This is the attitude which had prevailed here and I and many other people I talk to in my neighborhood and that I've grown up with are sick of it. Also, I'd like to point out that we all work hard, and the opportunity to work has been at the help of all of the people in our communities who have helped rear us. Teachers, nurses, doctors, firemen, policeman, babysitters, and many more. Just because some jobs like teaching or care giving don't provide with as much money, doesn't make them less important. In fact, my grandma used to tell me it "God's work". It takes a village to raise your children and it took a village to raise you all.