.
Feedback

Local Company Proposes Demolishing Victorians for New Downtown Apartment Complex

Monahan Parker, Inc. presented a plan for a four-story, 41-unit apartment complex on the corner of Second and B streets.

A local land subdivision company wants to demolish a commercial building and two Victorian residences on the corner of Second and B streets to build a four-story apartment building.

Monahan Parker, Inc., located in San Rafael, presented the concept to the Design Review Board Tuesday. The building would have 41 rental units, a garage with 57 parking spots and approximately 1,400 square feet of retail space on the ground floor of the northwest corner of B and Second streets.


“It’s always that fine line with how far do you go with the historical recall and imitation versus trying to be true to the day,” said Rick Strauss, the projects’s architect.

The new apartment would be a contemporary design, with floor-to-ceiling glass windows  on the upper units, and a flat roof. The exterior would have a terra cotta tile facade.

“I actually love this design but not for this street,” Federation of San Rafael Neighborhoods Chair Steve Patterson said. “In the General Plan, it talks about new buildings acknowledging the context of what surrounds them, and this building doesn’t acknowledge any of that.”

The company also proposes demolishing three existing structures on the site, including a commercial building at 809 B St. and two Victorian houses at 1212 and 1214 Second St.

The Victorian houses were constructed between 1887 and 1894. The 1214 Second St. house was converted to a retail space and is currently inhabited, according to the staff report.

The house at 1212 Second St. was damaged in a fire in November 2006, rendering the residence uninhabitable. The address has been a location from many homeless encampments since the fire, the staff report said.

The commercial building at 809 B St. used to be a restaurant, but is now vacant.

Hugo Landecker, representing the San Rafael Heritage Society, proposes moving the 1212 building to the west end of the site and restoring it.

“It’s cultural resource and these resources don’t come to be very often,” he said. “Every year it’s one less.”

Charles North and his sister own , the gluten-free grocery store on B Street next to the site. North, who is in favor of that site being developed, said the parking lot near the Victorians is a place for graffiti and other disturbances that have a negative effect on local businesses.

“Just today there was an attempted assault on a police officer which all my customers got to see and it really turns them off,” he said.

Since more buildings have been painted, and “the street is going through a little Renaissance” issues have gone down, North said.

The Design Review Board agreed with the need for the site to be developed, but echoed Patterson regarding the design. Since the proposal was an initial concept, they did not need to vote on the topic, but encouraged Monahan Parker to rethink the look of the building to make it blend with the neighborhood.

Julie Beach August 19, 2011 at 05:13 pm
oh no, more uglification of downtown san rafael is on it's way. let's destroy the history and character of san rafael a bit more with these highrise sterile office buildings and multi-unit dwellings-we just don't have enough of these structures in downtown yet. Infact, maybe we can get a big box store on 4th street.
Bret Goldman August 19, 2011 at 08:02 pm
While we're at it, might as well, put a baseball team at Albert Park.
Diane Sampson August 20, 2011 at 04:10 am
HEY! There's a parking shortage downtown. Let's raze the Mission to make a public parking lot, too.
Mike August 20, 2011 at 09:02 am
I live exactly across the street, it *is* ugly all ready. Those "historic" building have been the blight of this neighborhood for 20 years that i have been here. The now burned out hulk used to be cheap room where the low lifes did their drty deeds, including knife fight that would break out onto Second in the wee hours. Since the fire, caused by a shade tree mechanic working on his car parked against the front steps, the blight has gotten even worse, and the parking lot between it and the former Mexican restaurant, turned rehab/rehab church/Spanish church has become a cess pool of drigs and prostitution, servicing the patrons of the Free Food Vionent dePauls Dining room.
Please support this genuine urban renewal. It will be quite the improvement over what this corner has offered for more than 20 years.
jerry frate August 20, 2011 at 03:29 pm
Looks like 1950's design all over again. Hasn't anyone ever been to Santa Barbara? Lots of large buildings that look great with a historical theme. Don't we have a California mission? Why not a mediterranean design? This building is also 4 stories straight up from the sidewalk with no setbacks or relief for pedestrians. Most of the first floor is parking, how does the design hide the cars from the people walking by? Is there any landscaping, etc. etc.? One last thought, when designing a building on the "corner", architects will do something to emphasize that location,such as a tower, an angle at the sidewalk, a 45 degree entrance to the shops, etc. Something. This design totally ignores that the building is placed on the corner of B & 2nd Street. Back to the drawing board, please!
Murray August 20, 2011 at 06:26 pm
I agree with the first two words of the first comment on out--"oh no, ... ... ...."
OctaviusIII August 20, 2011 at 09:03 pm
I like the idea of building a new apartment building downtown, and I'm okay with the two victorians going, given their current state of repair. But 57 new parking spaces for 41 apartments? Really? I think this goes over the San Rafael parking minimums, and is within 1/2 mile of the Transit Center and future SMART station. Given the current plethora of parking options downtown and presence of a large garage less than a block away, they should cut that down by half.
Hopefully the Review Board will work with them to improve it a bit. All around, though, this is fantastic for downtown.
chris August 20, 2011 at 10:58 pm
Yuck! Ugly huge building. Save the Victorians! It would be tragic to allow the destruction of these beautiful little historical treasures. They do need renewal, but should be put on a historical preseervation list.
Diane Sampson August 20, 2011 at 11:05 pm
That building has no style or character at all. Paging another architect!
William Callahan August 21, 2011 at 02:36 pm
I'm the the owner of Tamalpais NatureWorks across the street (B) I attended this review meeting as well as the one last year. Yes am interested and concerned about the development of this property and how it fits into the neighborhood, but I'm more concerned about the 2 Victorians. As I stated in this meeting the building should be reduced in size so these two historical buildings are saved, and if there's no give in restoring them in place they should be moved and restored, saving their great stories and beauty for all to enjoy.
chris April 26, 2012 at 04:38 pm
This story becomes timely again.
Monahan Parker will present a new plan to the Design Review Public Meeting May 8 at 7pm. I hope this plan will address the issues that Design Review and Staff expressed at the August 2011 Review, so it has a chance of moving forward. This corner really does need a great plan! San Rafael sent out an RFP for development of this corner a decade ago or so I believe. Monahan Parker was selected as the developer. According to Jonathan Parker, after that the project kind of faded away for various reasons as the years went on. I hope the various reasons will be wisely addressed this next go around so the project can finally move forward soon! However, though I have not yet seen the new plans, I see a roadblock already. The new plan still calls for demolition of 1212 2nd St, the CEQA protected Victorian structure. This is a problem that will certainly cause more delays. There is a great deal of public support for saving this historical culture treasure. I strongly believe it should be saved!
chris April 26, 2012 at 04:40 pm
Continuing --
Though 1212 suffered a fire (of undetermined cause I believe) while owned by Parker and Monahan, and while the building was left vacant, this was mainly a facade fire and the building could certainly could be restored. On the night of the fire, one of the owners came to 1212 2nd and told the firefighters that this was a $0 loss fire because the building was slated for demolition to make room for a new project. This is a bit confusing to me, because the owners / developers knew the building was a historical cultural structure protected by CEQA, and just 2 months earlier, they had submitted plans to Design Review that did not call for the demolition. I would suggest that that this 2nd and B development should be watched carefully by the people of Marin, given the decade long history of Monahan Parker of sporadic action on this project, and Monahan Pacific’s litigious and financially troubling history with other county projects, and Tom Monahan’s recent reported connection with the appeals and potential lawsuits against Lucas’s Grady Ranch project which killed that project. A thoughtful development at this site would be so very welcomed and appreciated!! Christine Strand
John Parulis March 13, 2013 at 11:41 am
Please tell me that this isn't the same "Monahan" who went bankrupt and burned many of his contractors on the monster of ugliness on 33 North San Pedro? If so, maybe this time the development crazed city council will demand a "performance bond" from this Czar of idiotic developments.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Rafael Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Withdraw the Civic Center Priority Development Area
Ciel Niesen-Love June 15, 2013 at 07:41 pm
I, for one, am glad they're finally doing this. I have watched for years as Marin has ignored theRead More population growth that has affected us all. Not wanting to put in a commuter train, until the traffic lining the freeway is backed up into another county in the morning, is just one example of this. Then we have the fact that most of the children that my husband and I went to school with in Terra Linda have had to move to other counties because we can't find affordable housing in this one. To top it all off, it seems that the ones who have blocked us from making the smaller additions throughout the county have been people directly involved in the real estate industry, or just local home owners so worried about the value of their homes going down, that they fail to see the larger picture. So here we are, about to make a stride in alleviating the problem, and instead of rallying to make our communities better, we're trying to make it more difficult for the people who live and grew up here to still remain close to their families, not to mention the disabled adults and large elderly population in this county that are in need of this, as well. Some of the teacher's who work in this district have to commute in that traffic every morning, because they can't afford to live in this county, either. It's a sad commentary on where our priorities are when we can't support each other as a community.
John Parulis June 17, 2013 at 11:44 am
Ciel......we're talking big box freeway developments that will add tremendous traffic, schooling andRead More tax burdens to our community. Your ideas about population growth in Marin are off.
Ciel Niesen-Love June 17, 2013 at 02:49 pm
I know the population in Marin is 1% per year, but why do you think that is? People are livingRead More longer and our children are the healthiest in the country. I'll tell you why. It's because the children grow up and move out of the county, because it's not affordable. Here is an example of my latest thoughts on the matter: As the member of a Native American tribe, I have to say that I really resent being told where I should be able to live by an immigrant such as Richard Hall. I believe that roots are important and even if the growth rate has been 1%, it's only because most of the people who have grown up here can not afford to live here and move away. The elderly who make up a large percent of the population here are living longer due to medical advances and who do you suppose will take care of them? People such as myself and for not nearly enough money to live here. So what do you propose? You think that I should move to the East Bay or the North Bay and commute? Well, due to the lack of transportation support, that sound so lovely, let me tell you. Also, the children in Marin are the healthiest in the country according to a recent article I've read. Lower children death rates and such, so who is supposed to teach them and provide care for them and for not enough money to live here? Well, many teachers and care providers that I know that have to commute or live multiple roommates. You have successfully produced a community that only grows 1% per year. Congratulations. Through your grassroots efforts of blocking housing and transportation for years and claiming they don't live up to your standards, meanwhile not providing any pushes for what you might actually feel is smarter you have shut out your county's own children and hard working patriots. So, we can work for minimum wage taking care of your elderly, your children, your precious houses and cars, but God forbid, our children go to school with yours, or that you might actually have to bump into us at the supermarket and say "hi". This is the attitude which had prevailed here and I and many other people I talk to in my neighborhood and that I've grown up with are sick of it. Also, I'd like to point out that we all work hard, and the opportunity to work has been at the help of all of the people in our communities who have helped rear us. Teachers, nurses, doctors, firemen, policeman, babysitters, and many more. Just because some jobs like teaching or care giving don't provide with as much money, doesn't make them less important. In fact, my grandma used to tell me it "God's work". It takes a village to raise your children and it took a village to raise you all.