.
Feedback

Live Blog: Decision on Airport's Proposed Soccer Complex Expected on Dec. 17

Check here for a summary of the City Council meeting on the proposed recreational facility at the San Rafael Airport.

Local residents crowded in the Council Chambers for several hours to voice their opinions on the San Rafael Airport's proposed soccer complex, but council members will wait until Dec. 17 to make a decision on the application.

In a meeting that lasted over six hours, city officials and members of the public discussed the possible construction of a 39-foot-tall sports complex, built by the San Rafael Airport and Sports City. Due to the long meeting time, the council will meet again on Dec. 17 where they will discuss the project and vote.

The recreation complex is 85,700 square feet and will have indoor and two outdoor soccer fields as well as spectator seating, offices, food and beverage service, meetings rooms and a two-lane bridge deck. The project was first proposed in 2005. After drafting an environmental impact report and several public hearings, the Planning Commission approved the project in 5-1 vote in June 2012.

The project's challengers contend that the plan poses a safety threat to soccer players, who will play in fields parallel to the airport's runway. Other concerns include the environmental impacts on the surrounding habitat from developing the land, the alcohol sales at the cafe, and the increased traffic, lights and noise due to the activity at the complex.

The project is located in an area considered to be at low to moderate risk of a plane crash, according to Miranda Thompson, a safety consultant from Mead & Hunt. There is a 3 to 5 percent chance of aircraft accidents in the area where the outdoor fields are located, and an approximately 8 to 22 percent of accidents that could occur where the warm-up field is proposed. To mitigate these concerns, Thompson suggested limiting the amount of people in that area to 50, adding more emergency exits, not to have stationary seating and having fencing.

John Courtney is a senior planner at Lamphier Gregory and worked on the environmental impact report for the project. "We found there were no significant unavoidable impacts for this project," he said. All potential effects on the endangered bird the Clapper Rail, which lives in the surrounding area, can be mitigated.

Despite the reports, many are not convinced that the facility is the best fit for the wetland. "I can't equate loving soccer with loving this facility," said Margaret Johnston, who lives in Terra Linda and has kids who've played at several fields throughout the county. Johnston's main concern is the safety hazard regarding selling alcohol where there are children playing. While many soccer players think this is a way to get a free soccer field "tt's not free. There's a social and an environmental cost," she said.

Carolyn Lenert, representing the North San Rafael Coalition of Residents, said there are no neighborhood associations that support the proposal. Homeowners in North San Rafael oppose the project due to the environmental impacts and the private ownership of the complex. "Let's not privatize recreation for the wealthy who are going to pay," she said. "This is pay to play. This special treatment for some."

Opponents also include the Marin Audubon Society and the Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District.

Supporters of the plan believe that the complex will fill a void in local recreational fields. Since cities and schools are not able to build new fields due to budget restrictions, many soccer players have to commute all over the county for games. Many of the existing fields are poorly maintained. "I cannot tell you how many times my children did not play games on the weekend because it rained," Anthony Bouirke said at the meeting. Bouirke is also a pilot and said he would feel very comfortable with his kids playing at the field.

Other supporters include the San Rafael Chamber of Commerce, as well as several local soccer leagues.

"You can't be against everything everywhere all the time. There has to be balance," Airport Manager Robert Herbst said. According to Herbst, it is more dangerous to drive around the county to fields than play on the field next to the airport runway, and having more recreation will promote healthy habits and empower youth.

"The project in front of your will be an incredible community asset," he said. "It's the right project in the right location."

See more in-dept points about the project in the live blog above.

See what else is happening in San Rafael:

  1. Body Found in Structure at Fire Scene Near Fairfax
  2. Crime Trends: Assaults the Third Most Reported Crime in Last Two Weeks
  3. San Rafael’s Cheapest Homes: 30 Steven Way

"Like" us on Facebook | Follow us Twitter | Get "Patched" in with our newsletter | Start a blog

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Rafael Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Withdraw the Civic Center Priority Development Area
Ciel Niesen-Love June 15, 2013 at 07:41 pm
I, for one, am glad they're finally doing this. I have watched for years as Marin has ignored theRead More population growth that has affected us all. Not wanting to put in a commuter train, until the traffic lining the freeway is backed up into another county in the morning, is just one example of this. Then we have the fact that most of the children that my husband and I went to school with in Terra Linda have had to move to other counties because we can't find affordable housing in this one. To top it all off, it seems that the ones who have blocked us from making the smaller additions throughout the county have been people directly involved in the real estate industry, or just local home owners so worried about the value of their homes going down, that they fail to see the larger picture. So here we are, about to make a stride in alleviating the problem, and instead of rallying to make our communities better, we're trying to make it more difficult for the people who live and grew up here to still remain close to their families, not to mention the disabled adults and large elderly population in this county that are in need of this, as well. Some of the teacher's who work in this district have to commute in that traffic every morning, because they can't afford to live in this county, either. It's a sad commentary on where our priorities are when we can't support each other as a community.
John Parulis June 17, 2013 at 11:44 am
Ciel......we're talking big box freeway developments that will add tremendous traffic, schooling andRead More tax burdens to our community. Your ideas about population growth in Marin are off.
Ciel Niesen-Love June 17, 2013 at 02:49 pm
I know the population in Marin is 1% per year, but why do you think that is? People are livingRead More longer and our children are the healthiest in the country. I'll tell you why. It's because the children grow up and move out of the county, because it's not affordable. Here is an example of my latest thoughts on the matter: As the member of a Native American tribe, I have to say that I really resent being told where I should be able to live by an immigrant such as Richard Hall. I believe that roots are important and even if the growth rate has been 1%, it's only because most of the people who have grown up here can not afford to live here and move away. The elderly who make up a large percent of the population here are living longer due to medical advances and who do you suppose will take care of them? People such as myself and for not nearly enough money to live here. So what do you propose? You think that I should move to the East Bay or the North Bay and commute? Well, due to the lack of transportation support, that sound so lovely, let me tell you. Also, the children in Marin are the healthiest in the country according to a recent article I've read. Lower children death rates and such, so who is supposed to teach them and provide care for them and for not enough money to live here? Well, many teachers and care providers that I know that have to commute or live multiple roommates. You have successfully produced a community that only grows 1% per year. Congratulations. Through your grassroots efforts of blocking housing and transportation for years and claiming they don't live up to your standards, meanwhile not providing any pushes for what you might actually feel is smarter you have shut out your county's own children and hard working patriots. So, we can work for minimum wage taking care of your elderly, your children, your precious houses and cars, but God forbid, our children go to school with yours, or that you might actually have to bump into us at the supermarket and say "hi". This is the attitude which had prevailed here and I and many other people I talk to in my neighborhood and that I've grown up with are sick of it. Also, I'd like to point out that we all work hard, and the opportunity to work has been at the help of all of the people in our communities who have helped rear us. Teachers, nurses, doctors, firemen, policeman, babysitters, and many more. Just because some jobs like teaching or care giving don't provide with as much money, doesn't make them less important. In fact, my grandma used to tell me it "God's work". It takes a village to raise your children and it took a village to raise you all.