.
Feedback

Lawsuit Filed Against County for Plastic Bag Ban

Save the Plastic Bag Coalition filed a lawsuit against the county Thursday.

Save the Plastic Bag Coalition filed a lawsuit against Marin County on Thursday for passing an ordinance that would ban all plastic bags at groceries and check-counters in unincorporated Marin.

The lawsuit argues that the county violated the California Environmental Quality Act, also known as CEQA, by passing the ban without completing an environmental impact report first. 


“We’re suing based on the fact that the plastic bag ban issue requires science, namely environmental science, before a rational, intelligent decision can be made,” said Stephen Joseph, attorney for the Save the Plastic Bag Coalition.

The Marin Board of Supervisors unanimously passed the ordinance on Jan. 25. On top of banning plastic bags, the ordinance will also impose a 5-cent fee per paper bag for anyone who forgets their own reusable bags at grocery stores.

The coalition claims that an environmental impact report would’ve proved that a 5-cent fee wouldn’t be enough to dissuade shoppers from using paper bags, and the life cycle of paper bags results in 3.3 times the greenhouse gas emissions than plastic bags.

“The county has not even attempted to comply with CEQA,” Joseph said.  “In contrast, Los Angeles County, San Jose and Santa Monica completed EIRs before banning plastic bags.”

Since the county did not complete an EIR, the ordinance should be deemed invalid, the coalition argues. 

Supervisors anticipated a lawsuit back in January when Joseph told them during the public comment section that the coalition would be taking legal action against the ordinance.

Supervisor Charles McGlashan, who represents Mill Valley, Belvedere, Sausalito and Tiburon, after they passed the ban that the price of the litigation would cost less, between $5,000 to $10,000 depending, than an EIR, which could cost millions. 

Studies have shown that similar bans encourage the use of reusable bags but don't incite a dramatic increase in the consumption of paper bags, he told Patch.

None of the supervisors were available for comment. The county has 30 days to issue a response.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Rafael Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kevin Moore May 11, 2013 at 04:20 pm
It would be nice if the comments section had "Thumbs up / Thumbs down" like the PressRead More Democrat.
Bob April 6, 2013 at 05:20 pm
Check with the San Rafael planning commission and get the low-down on why they turned down aRead More developer who submitted his plans to demolish and rebuild a mixed commercial/residential building at 2nd and B. That's directly across the street from SVDP, and a notorious loitering spot. It's currently a run-down box building that's long past its prime. The developer came in with a beautiful plan, and it was denied for, among other things, because it was not in keeping with the "Victorian era" of the others, and because the city was afraid people would store their bikes on the balconies. Take a look at it. It's the most run-down corner in the downtown area. A great way for a small town to thrive and achieve an identity, is to get people living there. The city makes it extremely difficult with their rigid design board, and archaic operations that remind me of private industry in the 70s. Oh, and then they approved Target - completely disregarding the data from our neighbors up north, as well as other small towns.
Scott Adams April 4, 2013 at 07:08 pm
Tim, I am aware of many who want to increase the housing density downtown. I am also aware thereRead More has been objections particularly around the bus and future SMART station. It seems having commercial use at street level and housing above is favored by the city. It would definitely help bring people downtown. Other elements besides safety, includes maintenance, on going activities and marketing. I made reference to Healdsburg which is a good case study. They endorsed a study by urban planners around 1990. It took until 2000 when Hotel Healdsburg opened and then the downtown took off. They have one big asset and that is their city park which is where they have ongoing activities. Public Spaces such as this offer a sense of place and acts as a magnet. If you go two or three block away from the park, Healdsburg is just another sleepy little town of 11,000. Sure the wine country is a tourist attraction, but according to the County Visitor's Bureau Marin has 12 million visitors a year who enjoy our natural environment and 80% leave and go elsewhere in the evening.
Tim H April 4, 2013 at 04:41 pm
Thank you all for your interest in this topic. Scott, are you aware of any new multifamily or mixedRead More use housing in downtown on the horizon? Someone in another article mentioned the need for greater density in the downtown area. It seems like greater density could make San Rafael a more attractive place to bring business. Maybe it's me being optimistic, but certain areas seem ripe for development which could be a catalyst for improving downtown. Just curious if others had any perspective of this issue.