.
Feedback

Huffman Touts Bills to Boost State Fish & Game

If signed into law by Gov. Jerry Brown, AB 2402 would streamline permitting processes, improve the use of independent science and create an environmental crimes task force to facilitate prosecution of wildlife crimes.

Two measures that seek to improve the California Department of Fish and Game were passed by the state Legislature on its last day of session and await the signature Gov. Jerry Brown, according to the office of Assemblymember Jared Huffman (D-San Rafael).

Assembly Bill 2402, authored by Huffman, and Senate Bill 1148 make significant changes that will benefit California’s fish and wildlife and the people of California, Huffman said. He added that the two bills will implement the goals and recommendations of the department’s strategic vision process that involved over 50 diverse stakeholders and extensive public input.

“The health of California’s fish and wildlife populations, and the people and businesses that rely on them, depend on a well-functioning and competent Department of Fish and Game,” Huffman said in the release. “These bills will enable the Department and the Commission to do a better job as public trustees for the state’s fish and wildlife, and for the people they serve.”

Sen. Fran Pavley (D-Agoura Hills), who chairs the Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee, observed that both bills not only help the department but also assist distinct constituencies that depend on the department.

“There is always more to do, but these two bills are significant steps forward,” said Pavley. “The mitigation banking provisions are especially important to the private business world, for the businesses operating mitigation banks and also for private developers who need mitigation banks to provide habitat lands when mitigation is necessary for projects to be approved.”

AB 2402 would streamline permitting processes; improve the Department’s use of independent science; change the name of the Department of Fish and Game to the Department of Fish and Wildlife to accurately reflect the state agency’s broader mission; create an environmental crimes task force to facilitate prosecution of wildlife crimes; encourage intergovernmental coordination, nonprofit partnerships and use of credible science; extend benefits to fish and game wardens; allow for adjustment of fees for cost recovery; and study the feasibility of upgrading the Department’s electronic systems to track fish and game code violations. 

SB 1148 contains provisions re-assigning several hunting and fishing and other regulatory provisions from the Legislature to the Fish and Game Commission; authorizing the department to recoup its program and implementation costs from many fee-based programs; establishing conservation, public information, and other criteria including fees agreed to by industry for conservation and mitigation banking activities; and  strengthening the wild and heritage trout program while improving the scientific management of trout hatcheries and appropriating $1 million for hatchery improvements.

Curtis Knight, conservation director for California Trout stated that “Native trout and hatchery operations get short shrift in Sacramento. This important legislation is the boost California’s trout need.”

Brian Johnson, California director for Trout Unlimited added, “These bills are good news for everyone who loves to fish. We’re grateful for Senator Pavley’s and Assemblymember Huffman’s leadership.” 

Huffman represents the 6th Assembly District, which encompasses southern Sonoma County and all of Marin County. First elected in 2006, he serves as co-chair of the Legislative Environmental Caucus.

Here's what else is happening on San Rafael Patch:

"Like" us on Facebook | Follow us Twitter | Get "Patched" in with our newsletter | Start a blog

Steve September 10, 2012 at 05:06 pm
There is a serious flaw in the bill. The bill allows Fish and Wildlife to accept funds and enter into so called "public private partnerships" with private persons, corporations, and foundations without limiting the role the funding source or persons connected to the funding source in the decision making process. This is poor public policy. The decision making process should be completely controlled by Fish and Wildlife. The department should be prohibited from using any consultants with ties to the funding source and no person with ties to the funding source should be allowed to serve on advisory panels. This bill was rushed through at the last minute in order to allow well funded foundations with a point of view to fund projects and have those connected to the foundation participate in the decision making process. How would you react to having the building trade association fund the process for revising the building code and also participate in making decisions on the proposed changes. Saving a fish is not worth public loss of faith in the political process.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Rafael Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Withdraw the Civic Center Priority Development Area
Ciel Niesen-Love June 15, 2013 at 07:41 pm
I, for one, am glad they're finally doing this. I have watched for years as Marin has ignored theRead More population growth that has affected us all. Not wanting to put in a commuter train, until the traffic lining the freeway is backed up into another county in the morning, is just one example of this. Then we have the fact that most of the children that my husband and I went to school with in Terra Linda have had to move to other counties because we can't find affordable housing in this one. To top it all off, it seems that the ones who have blocked us from making the smaller additions throughout the county have been people directly involved in the real estate industry, or just local home owners so worried about the value of their homes going down, that they fail to see the larger picture. So here we are, about to make a stride in alleviating the problem, and instead of rallying to make our communities better, we're trying to make it more difficult for the people who live and grew up here to still remain close to their families, not to mention the disabled adults and large elderly population in this county that are in need of this, as well. Some of the teacher's who work in this district have to commute in that traffic every morning, because they can't afford to live in this county, either. It's a sad commentary on where our priorities are when we can't support each other as a community.
John Parulis June 17, 2013 at 11:44 am
Ciel......we're talking big box freeway developments that will add tremendous traffic, schooling andRead More tax burdens to our community. Your ideas about population growth in Marin are off.
Ciel Niesen-Love June 17, 2013 at 02:49 pm
I know the population in Marin is 1% per year, but why do you think that is? People are livingRead More longer and our children are the healthiest in the country. I'll tell you why. It's because the children grow up and move out of the county, because it's not affordable. Here is an example of my latest thoughts on the matter: As the member of a Native American tribe, I have to say that I really resent being told where I should be able to live by an immigrant such as Richard Hall. I believe that roots are important and even if the growth rate has been 1%, it's only because most of the people who have grown up here can not afford to live here and move away. The elderly who make up a large percent of the population here are living longer due to medical advances and who do you suppose will take care of them? People such as myself and for not nearly enough money to live here. So what do you propose? You think that I should move to the East Bay or the North Bay and commute? Well, due to the lack of transportation support, that sound so lovely, let me tell you. Also, the children in Marin are the healthiest in the country according to a recent article I've read. Lower children death rates and such, so who is supposed to teach them and provide care for them and for not enough money to live here? Well, many teachers and care providers that I know that have to commute or live multiple roommates. You have successfully produced a community that only grows 1% per year. Congratulations. Through your grassroots efforts of blocking housing and transportation for years and claiming they don't live up to your standards, meanwhile not providing any pushes for what you might actually feel is smarter you have shut out your county's own children and hard working patriots. So, we can work for minimum wage taking care of your elderly, your children, your precious houses and cars, but God forbid, our children go to school with yours, or that you might actually have to bump into us at the supermarket and say "hi". This is the attitude which had prevailed here and I and many other people I talk to in my neighborhood and that I've grown up with are sick of it. Also, I'd like to point out that we all work hard, and the opportunity to work has been at the help of all of the people in our communities who have helped rear us. Teachers, nurses, doctors, firemen, policeman, babysitters, and many more. Just because some jobs like teaching or care giving don't provide with as much money, doesn't make them less important. In fact, my grandma used to tell me it "God's work". It takes a village to raise your children and it took a village to raise you all.