.
Feedback

Dominican to Absorb $32K in Sequestration Cuts to Financial Aid

University takes hit via Federal Pell Grant program but officials say they won’t pass it onto students.

In the grand scheme of the federal government’s $85 billion in across-the-board "sequestration" cuts that begin kicking in on Friday, $32,717 seems a mere pittance.

But according to John Borowsky, the vice president of enrollment management at Dominican University in San Rafael, sequestration will cut the school’s financial aid funding by that amount in 2013-2014, a move he said would have enough of an impact on the hundreds of low-income Dominican students who receive the aid that school officials have decided not to pass it onto them.

Dominican and thousands of colleges and universities across the country are facing cuts to Federal Pell Grant program funding, specifically money allocated to Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants (SEOG) and Federal Work Study programs, according to the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators.

“We would rather absorb this relatively small hit than pass it onto our students,” Borowsky said, noting that students benefiting from those programs come from families making less than $35,000 a year. “These are profoundly needy people.”

The bulk of Federal Pell Grant funding – the portion doled out by the federal government and not the schools themselves – remains intact. Dominican students were set to receive $364,082 during the 2013-2014 allocation period, according to the association. None of College of Marin’s $415,504 Pell-related funding is set to be cut under sequestration.

In Dominican’s case, students receive an average of $1,000 from the two portions of the Pell program that are set to receive an 8 percent cut, for an average $80 loss for those students, Borowsky said.

“That’s quite a bit of money in many cases,” he said. “Enough that we didn’t want to pass it on. Although we certainly wish that financial aid for students from the government wasn’t actually decreasing, of course.”

The sequestration cuts were put into law in 2011 during an earlier fiscal standoff between the Obama Administration and Republicans in Congress. Those leaders now appear unable to agree on how to stop the cuts from happening.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Rafael Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kevin Moore May 11, 2013 at 04:20 pm
It would be nice if the comments section had "Thumbs up / Thumbs down" like the PressRead More Democrat.
Bob April 6, 2013 at 05:20 pm
Check with the San Rafael planning commission and get the low-down on why they turned down aRead More developer who submitted his plans to demolish and rebuild a mixed commercial/residential building at 2nd and B. That's directly across the street from SVDP, and a notorious loitering spot. It's currently a run-down box building that's long past its prime. The developer came in with a beautiful plan, and it was denied for, among other things, because it was not in keeping with the "Victorian era" of the others, and because the city was afraid people would store their bikes on the balconies. Take a look at it. It's the most run-down corner in the downtown area. A great way for a small town to thrive and achieve an identity, is to get people living there. The city makes it extremely difficult with their rigid design board, and archaic operations that remind me of private industry in the 70s. Oh, and then they approved Target - completely disregarding the data from our neighbors up north, as well as other small towns.
Scott Adams April 4, 2013 at 07:08 pm
Tim, I am aware of many who want to increase the housing density downtown. I am also aware thereRead More has been objections particularly around the bus and future SMART station. It seems having commercial use at street level and housing above is favored by the city. It would definitely help bring people downtown. Other elements besides safety, includes maintenance, on going activities and marketing. I made reference to Healdsburg which is a good case study. They endorsed a study by urban planners around 1990. It took until 2000 when Hotel Healdsburg opened and then the downtown took off. They have one big asset and that is their city park which is where they have ongoing activities. Public Spaces such as this offer a sense of place and acts as a magnet. If you go two or three block away from the park, Healdsburg is just another sleepy little town of 11,000. Sure the wine country is a tourist attraction, but according to the County Visitor's Bureau Marin has 12 million visitors a year who enjoy our natural environment and 80% leave and go elsewhere in the evening.
Tim H April 4, 2013 at 04:41 pm
Thank you all for your interest in this topic. Scott, are you aware of any new multifamily or mixedRead More use housing in downtown on the horizon? Someone in another article mentioned the need for greater density in the downtown area. It seems like greater density could make San Rafael a more attractive place to bring business. Maybe it's me being optimistic, but certain areas seem ripe for development which could be a catalyst for improving downtown. Just curious if others had any perspective of this issue.