Fluoride Labeled a Developmental Neurotoxin : March 2014 Journal Lancet Neurology‏

Here is another scientific article showing the serious dangers of drinking hydrofluorosilicic acid in our municipal drinking water.  There are thousands of studies now showing unequivocally that hydrofluorosilicic acid damages our health.  Yet there is not even one scientific study on hydrofluorosilicic acid showing it is safe and effective for providing fluoride treatments.
  
The CA State Health Services department, the Attorney General's office and Marc Levine's office say that the authorization to fluoridate Marin water comes from the MMWD Board members.  So why do the MMWD Board Members and Legal Counsel insist on medicating us via our drinking water without dosage control, (once fluoride is put into the water, you can not control the dosage), without medical oversight and without individual consent.  
 
Lancet IQ Article & Kansas Legislation
 
An article was published in the March 2014 Journal Lancet Neurology in which medical authorities newly classified fluoride as a developmental neurotoxin. The prominent peer-reviewed medical journal published the article entitled “Neurobehavioral effects of developmental toxicity.” The authors point out that 27 studies of children exposed to fluoride in drinking water found an average lowering of IQ by seven points; twice that of the effects of secondhand smoke on children.
Dental fluorosis is very serious and as more and more parents realize that the damage done to their children's teeth is from drinking fluoridated water, we will see many more legal cases.  This is unnecessary damage being done to our own children from drinking fluoridated water.  Water fluoridation also violates the CEQA laws.    

****News Alert!!!! Public Justice involved in Fluorosis Lawsuit from Water Fluoridation:The highly respected attorney firm Public Justice, based in Washington D.C. and with 3,000 affiliated attorneys, is now involved in the issue of dental fluorosis fluoride harm. Public Justice has signed on to help present arguments in a precedent-setting fluorosis legal case.  For decades, promoters of use of fluorides have dodged being placed under oath to directly and specifically answer the unanswerable questions about fluoride harm. They have not faced the real possibility of answering attorneys or investigators, or meeting persons with documented harm from fluorides, in courtrooms or in public hearings. The unfolding Fluoridegate scandal and growing interest in the fluoride issue by law firms are bringing this closer to happening.
http://www.fluoridelitigation.com/