.
Feedback

Bill Signed by Governor Will Help Improve Quality of Life for Residents of California Veterans Homes

Budget cuts have led to the closure of activities designed for the general welfare of residents of California's veterans homes. AB 1739, signed by Gov. Brown, will help address that problem.

Earlier this month, Governor Edmund G. (Jerry) Brown Jr. signed Assembly Bill 1739, a bill I introduced to help improve the quality of life for residents of California’s veterans’ homes.

AB 1739 simply authorizes the administrator of a California veterans home to enter into an agreement with a home’s allied council, made up of veteran residents of the home, and authorized to represent the residents in various ways to run activities that enrich the lives of the residents.

Under current law, administrators hold discretion over morale, welfare and recreation (MWR) facilities and activities at the veterans’ homes. MWR money may be used to provide for the general welfare of the veterans in the home, including a Veterans Home Exchange, hobby shop, movie theater, library, band, sports activities and celebrations. MWR money may not be used for things such as medical or related treatments, nor can they spent on maintenance of a home’s physical plant.

Unfortunately, due to budget constraints and other factors, many of the above mentioned quality-of-life services or activities have been shut down in recent years. 

The vets who reside at the state’s veterans homes come from various backgrounds, and many of them have expertise in a wide range of fields. They also have the desire to see that MWR facilities and activities are available to home residents. What they lacked, until recently, was the ability to assume responsibility for operating the facilities and activities which are presently shut down. AB 1739 would allow them to assume that responsibility at the discretion of a home administrator.

Given their collective interest in taking on that role, combined with ongoing fiscal constraints faced by the veterans’ homes and the California Department of Veterans Affairs, AB 1739 offers a win-win solution that promises a brighter future for many of our veterans.

These vets fought courageously and defended our country with pride and valor. AB 1739 provides them with a vehicle for expanding their contributions to the welfare and well-being of other residents of the veterans’ homes.

Assemblyman Michael Allen is in a two-person runoff with San Rafael City Council member Marc Levin for the 10th Assembly District, which includes part of Sonoma County. The election is Nov. 6.

Levine also blogs for Patch.

Michael July 25, 2012 at 10:03 pm
politicians like Michael Allen would be better advised to work to stop all of the funding for the insane wars our politicians like to play with other people's lives. People better wake up and realize just how many soldiers are now being returned to American with lifetime disabilities that the American taxpayers must then pay for. Young kids coming back from desert counties with all kinds of ailments that classifies them as 'disabled'. And there seems no end in sight. They (American soldiers) are not defending America as some blindly believe. they are not serving America rather they are serving the interests of politicians and big corporations that make up the war machine. Career politicians have convinced many (those who do not think for themselves) that it is America's responsibility to defend freedom around the world. This is a lie unsupported by our constitution. But we continue to elect the same bunch over and over and over. Our current congress and president have trampled on our constitution and they know it. But some would simply re-elect these same people. Pitiful.
Toni Shroyer July 26, 2012 at 02:00 am
Marc Levine is the best choice for the Assembly seat. He is not part of the "Sacramento Machine."
M. Calwald July 26, 2012 at 11:23 am
Vote Marc Levine! Our local candidate!
M. Calwald July 26, 2012 at 11:24 am
agreed. We need new faces is Sacto.
John Burke July 26, 2012 at 12:11 pm
I believe you misconstru the intent of this article. It's purpose was to depict that an administrative oversight was being corrected to improve the quality of life for veterans, not to fund increased war spending. While I concur with your point that war spending is often times misguided, I do not think this article is the forum for that discussion. Incidentally, have you ever served your.country for the good of humanity? Consider it
Tina McMillan July 26, 2012 at 02:57 pm
http://legiscan.com/gaits/text/659380 Here is the text of the bill that passed. It does not provide additional funding for veteran's homes. It does allow veteran's to administer their own funds.
The article is an attempt by Michael Allen to use Patch to promote his bid for election in the fall. It is also a barometer of his popularity among Novato residents. My first thought when reading it was not that he had helped veterans but that he flip flops on issues depending on his need at the time. Mr. Allen = Political Expediency. For example supporting the Graton Rancheria Casino up until the point it was clearly going to pass and then removing his support to try and garner votes from those opposed. We need to do far more for our veterans. There are so many returning from war physically and emotionally battered. The funding for the VA in California seems insufficient to meet the actual need. My father served in the Air Force for 30+ years. He was a Lt Colonel when he retired. It was at a time when our military was valued by the federal government. Now it is ironic. Men and women serving in congress get health benefits for the rest of their lives and military personnel and their families have health benefits that fall far short of treating the wounds that they return with following service overseas. We need to rethink our priorities.
D Rex July 26, 2012 at 03:56 pm
Thank a Vet.....today!
Selena Xochitl Martinez July 26, 2012 at 04:29 pm
Ok, back to veterans.....
I would like to comment on my experiences and what I have observed as a veteran of the vietnam era conflict. I receive the highest quality medical care on the planet, services are readily available, both social development, mental health and medical care. As a transgender veteran I am treated with the highest degree of dignity and respect as do all veterans. My education and living expenses are well funded by the veterans administration, I plan to give back to my fellow veterans by working at the veterans administration hospital after I graduate. in the meantime I volunteer. walking the hallways of the veterans administration hospital brings up all sorts of feelings about the issues of war, I see the tragic results, but I also see the compassion, the gratitude. I see a tremendous amount of pride on the faces of world war 2 veterans, I find it a great privilege to be able to spend time with these elders. Even veterans from The horrible wars of the middle east have pride in serving their country. not all but most. I am only relating my experiences.
Tina McMillan July 26, 2012 at 10:48 pm
It is good that you were able to receive the highest quality medical care. There are many servicemen and women who have been forced to wait for extended periods of time just to receive basic care and mental health counseling after returning home from service overseas. The number of vets affected by PTSD has risen and the lack of treatment options has been difficult to witness.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/20/us/veterans-affairs-dept-to-increase-mental-health-staffing.html "… The announcement comes as the department is facing intensified criticism for delays in providing psychological services to veterans at some of its major medical centers. The department’s own inspector general is expected to release a report as soon as next week asserting that wait times for mental health services are significantly longer than the department has been willing to acknowledge. Senator Patty Murray, a Washington Democrat who is chairwoman of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee, has also scheduled hearings next week about the delays. And last year, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, based in San Francisco, issued a scathing ruling saying that the department had failed to provide adequate mental health services to veterans. “No more veterans should be compelled to agonize or perish while the government fails to perform its obligation,” Judge Stephen Reinhardt wrote for the majority. The Obama administration has appealed the ruling…."
Selena Xochitl Martinez July 27, 2012 at 01:58 am
I want to make it clear that I continue to receive my medical care at no cost to me, for life. That alone is one hell of a reason to be grateful.....
Selena Xochitl Martinez July 27, 2012 at 02:08 am
Half full? half empty?...I choose half full. perhaps I have blinders on but I personally benefit from PTSD services offered, there is lots of focus on PTSD these days, I know, I have my own to deal with.
The improvements we are having at the Veterans medical center as well as the education and training benefits are a direct result of the Senate, Congressional and veterans demands. Clearly there is always a need to improve. I feel the call has been answered to a certain degree.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Rafael Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Withdraw the Civic Center Priority Development Area
Ciel Niesen-Love June 15, 2013 at 07:41 pm
I, for one, am glad they're finally doing this. I have watched for years as Marin has ignored theRead More population growth that has affected us all. Not wanting to put in a commuter train, until the traffic lining the freeway is backed up into another county in the morning, is just one example of this. Then we have the fact that most of the children that my husband and I went to school with in Terra Linda have had to move to other counties because we can't find affordable housing in this one. To top it all off, it seems that the ones who have blocked us from making the smaller additions throughout the county have been people directly involved in the real estate industry, or just local home owners so worried about the value of their homes going down, that they fail to see the larger picture. So here we are, about to make a stride in alleviating the problem, and instead of rallying to make our communities better, we're trying to make it more difficult for the people who live and grew up here to still remain close to their families, not to mention the disabled adults and large elderly population in this county that are in need of this, as well. Some of the teacher's who work in this district have to commute in that traffic every morning, because they can't afford to live in this county, either. It's a sad commentary on where our priorities are when we can't support each other as a community.
John Parulis June 17, 2013 at 11:44 am
Ciel......we're talking big box freeway developments that will add tremendous traffic, schooling andRead More tax burdens to our community. Your ideas about population growth in Marin are off.
Ciel Niesen-Love June 17, 2013 at 02:49 pm
I know the population in Marin is 1% per year, but why do you think that is? People are livingRead More longer and our children are the healthiest in the country. I'll tell you why. It's because the children grow up and move out of the county, because it's not affordable. Here is an example of my latest thoughts on the matter: As the member of a Native American tribe, I have to say that I really resent being told where I should be able to live by an immigrant such as Richard Hall. I believe that roots are important and even if the growth rate has been 1%, it's only because most of the people who have grown up here can not afford to live here and move away. The elderly who make up a large percent of the population here are living longer due to medical advances and who do you suppose will take care of them? People such as myself and for not nearly enough money to live here. So what do you propose? You think that I should move to the East Bay or the North Bay and commute? Well, due to the lack of transportation support, that sound so lovely, let me tell you. Also, the children in Marin are the healthiest in the country according to a recent article I've read. Lower children death rates and such, so who is supposed to teach them and provide care for them and for not enough money to live here? Well, many teachers and care providers that I know that have to commute or live multiple roommates. You have successfully produced a community that only grows 1% per year. Congratulations. Through your grassroots efforts of blocking housing and transportation for years and claiming they don't live up to your standards, meanwhile not providing any pushes for what you might actually feel is smarter you have shut out your county's own children and hard working patriots. So, we can work for minimum wage taking care of your elderly, your children, your precious houses and cars, but God forbid, our children go to school with yours, or that you might actually have to bump into us at the supermarket and say "hi". This is the attitude which had prevailed here and I and many other people I talk to in my neighborhood and that I've grown up with are sick of it. Also, I'd like to point out that we all work hard, and the opportunity to work has been at the help of all of the people in our communities who have helped rear us. Teachers, nurses, doctors, firemen, policeman, babysitters, and many more. Just because some jobs like teaching or care giving don't provide with as much money, doesn't make them less important. In fact, my grandma used to tell me it "God's work". It takes a village to raise your children and it took a village to raise you all.