.
Feedback

Five Steps State Legislature Needs to Take to Rebuild Trust

The trust that voters have in state government has been broken. Here are five steps to begin regaining that trust.

We all know voters are dissatisfied with state government's ability to address our biggest challenges.

A recent field poll showed the California Legislature with a woeful 19 percent approval rating. But it's becoming clear to me that something deeper is going on than bad polling numbers. The trust that voters have in state government has, in a fundamental way, been broken.

It's time to wake up and see this for what it is: a threat to the ability of any party or person to govern California effectively. The loss of trust is no longer just a symptom of Sacramento dysfunction, it is a cause. We can't restore school funding, balance the budget or build for the future if every government action is viewed with such skepticism.

Case in point: The budget enacted by the Legislature relies on voter approval of Gov. Jerry Brown's tax plan to protect school funding and keep the budget balanced. But the tax measure faces a public that doesn't trust state government. Many others have pointed to this problem, but no one seems to be doing anything about it.

What is needed is an urgent and relentless effort by the Legislature between now and November to repair some of the broken trust.

I'm proposing five things my fellow Democrats, who control the Assembly and the Senate, could do right now to start this process.

1. Increase transparency. Earlier this year, it took a judicial order to compel the Legislature to release its office budgets. It's time for a new approach to transparency. The Legislature should also increase transparency at the state level. This is vital given the scandal about and

2. Set five-year budget goals. The Legislature should publish and actively explain to the public its five-year plan to balance the budget and restore funding levels for education. Even if this involves tough choices, voters would appreciate a sense of where we are going.

3. Commit to pensions. Many legislators have said action on pensions is key to building public support ahead of November's tax vote. Gov. Brown put forward a plan that seemed to have broad support. Unfortunately, after months of delay, the Legislature has lost the chance to put certain reforms on the November ballot that require voter approval. At this point, the Legislature should at least go beyond what is still on the table to show resolve to voters.

4. Pass tougher conflict-of-interest rules. The Legislature should close loopholes allowing legislative staffers and many local government officials to accept outside lobbying and consulting contracts while still in government. Better still, the Legislature should follow other states that have banned fundraising by representatives while the Legislature is in active session. The latter change would show real commitment to winning trust.

5. Show that the Legislature is also feeling the budget crunch. Recent news stories revealed that legislative staffers had received pay raises at a time when services are being slashed. The Legislature should follow the governor's example. He started his administration cutting pay and perks.

At the local government level, where I currently serve, the disconnect between voters and government is not so severe. It's a healthier kind of skepticism that we see. If we can move the relationship between the state and its citizens in this direction, it would do a world of good. We need to start now.

Marc Levine, a member of the San Rafael City Council, is in a two-person runoff with Assemblyman Michael Allen for the 10th Assembly District, which includes part of Sonoma County. The election is Nov. 6.

Allen also blogs for Patch.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from San Rafael Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kevin Moore May 11, 2013 at 04:20 pm
It would be nice if the comments section had "Thumbs up / Thumbs down" like the PressRead More Democrat.
Bob April 6, 2013 at 05:20 pm
Check with the San Rafael planning commission and get the low-down on why they turned down aRead More developer who submitted his plans to demolish and rebuild a mixed commercial/residential building at 2nd and B. That's directly across the street from SVDP, and a notorious loitering spot. It's currently a run-down box building that's long past its prime. The developer came in with a beautiful plan, and it was denied for, among other things, because it was not in keeping with the "Victorian era" of the others, and because the city was afraid people would store their bikes on the balconies. Take a look at it. It's the most run-down corner in the downtown area. A great way for a small town to thrive and achieve an identity, is to get people living there. The city makes it extremely difficult with their rigid design board, and archaic operations that remind me of private industry in the 70s. Oh, and then they approved Target - completely disregarding the data from our neighbors up north, as well as other small towns.
Scott Adams April 4, 2013 at 07:08 pm
Tim, I am aware of many who want to increase the housing density downtown. I am also aware thereRead More has been objections particularly around the bus and future SMART station. It seems having commercial use at street level and housing above is favored by the city. It would definitely help bring people downtown. Other elements besides safety, includes maintenance, on going activities and marketing. I made reference to Healdsburg which is a good case study. They endorsed a study by urban planners around 1990. It took until 2000 when Hotel Healdsburg opened and then the downtown took off. They have one big asset and that is their city park which is where they have ongoing activities. Public Spaces such as this offer a sense of place and acts as a magnet. If you go two or three block away from the park, Healdsburg is just another sleepy little town of 11,000. Sure the wine country is a tourist attraction, but according to the County Visitor's Bureau Marin has 12 million visitors a year who enjoy our natural environment and 80% leave and go elsewhere in the evening.
Tim H April 4, 2013 at 04:41 pm
Thank you all for your interest in this topic. Scott, are you aware of any new multifamily or mixedRead More use housing in downtown on the horizon? Someone in another article mentioned the need for greater density in the downtown area. It seems like greater density could make San Rafael a more attractive place to bring business. Maybe it's me being optimistic, but certain areas seem ripe for development which could be a catalyst for improving downtown. Just curious if others had any perspective of this issue.